Home / Stores / Nutritienda vs Quamtrax
Store against store · data from
Nutritienda or Quamtrax: which is cheaper across 4 categories
Nutritienda13Quamtraxacross 4 categories both of them sell
The short answer. Of the 4 categories both sell, Nutritienda has the lower median in 1 and Quamtrax in 3. Across the whole catalogue, Quamtrax sits 5 % below the market median and Nutritienda 12 % above.
No store is cheap at everything. This page does not name a winner: it gives each one’s median in every category they share, so you can see where each wins and by how much. Prices are from the last collection and change; catalogue and certification change far less.
† Some links are affiliate links — they do not change the ranking
Some store links are affiliate links: if you buy through them, this site may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It changes nothing in the ranking: the score is computed beforehand and without reading those links, and products with no affiliate programme appear exactly the same. How it is calculated.
Category by category
Each store’s median, in its unit
| Category | Nutritienda | Quamtrax | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collagen8 products from Nutritienda and 4 from Quamtrax. | €63.00/kg+5 % vs market | €56.86/kg-5 % vs market | 11 %cheaper: Quamtrax |
| Creatine5 products from Nutritienda and 5 from Quamtrax. | €66.60/kg+12 % vs market | €63.00/kg+6 % vs market | 6 %cheaper: Quamtrax |
| Glutamine4 products from Nutritienda and 3 from Quamtrax. | €78.30/kg+32 % vs market | €49.17/kg-17 % vs market | 59 %cheaper: Quamtrax |
| Whey protein (concentrate)6 products from Nutritienda and 7 from Quamtrax. | €36.98/kg-18 % vs market | €41.45/kg-8 % vs market | 12 %cheaper: Nutritienda |
The median is not the price you will pay. It is the midpoint of that store’s catalogue in that category: it tells you where to start looking, not what to buy. That is what each category table is for, where the specific row counts.
Both stores, figure by figure
What is not today’s price
| Figure | Nutritienda | Quamtrax |
|---|---|---|
| Price indexMedian distance from the market median in the categories where it has three products or more. Negative is cheap. | +12 % | -5 % |
| Categories comparedAcross the whole site, in how many it has enough catalogue to be measured. | 10 | 5 |
| Products comparedThe ones this site collects from that store, not its whole catalogue. | 62 | 30 |
| Brands in the catalogueA single brand means own brand (no manufacturer margin); many means reselling. | 25 | 1 |
| With lab reportLevel 3 or 4: testing a batch costs money and is passed on in the price. | 0 of 62 | 1 of 30 |
| Product pages declaring additivesAn additive takes up grams that are not active ingredient and is cheaper than it. | 0 % | 3 % |
Questions about Nutritienda and Quamtrax
Answered with the data on this page
- Nutritienda or Quamtrax?
- Of the 4 categories both sell, Nutritienda has the lower median in 1 and Quamtrax in 3. Across the whole catalogue, Quamtrax sits 5 % below the market median and Nutritienda 12 % above. Price is not everything: Nutritienda publishes lab reports on 0 products and Quamtrax on 1.
- In which categories does each one win?
- Nutritienda is cheaper in whey protein (concentrate). Quamtrax is cheaper in collagen, creatine, glutamine. These are medians of each catalogue in each category’s unit, with prices from October 15, 2026.
- Which catalogue is bigger?
- Nutritienda has 62 products compared here across 14 categories and Quamtrax 30 across 10. Nutritienda spreads its catalogue across 25 brands and Quamtrax only its own: a store selling its own brand skips the manufacturer’s margin, a reseller pays it and in exchange carries brands the other does not.
Keep comparing
The same stores, by category